24 Comments

avator
China Joe Biden
2 months ago

Each round costs over a million dollars per round which is why they decided to not use it because it was not practical

avator
Yolanda Pineda
Arlington, TX 路 19 days ago

WOW 馃槸馃槸馃槸

comment picture
avator
Harvey Shadbolt
Amarillo, TX 路 a month ago

Obomanation of a president is why we have the problems we have now. Obama is a criminal he just won't get what he deserves! The protected class!

avator
joseph lamey
Las Vegas, NV 路 2 months ago

its not practical for warfare. uses too much power.

avator
Jonathan Nelson
New York City, NY 路 a month ago

I thought a railgun was an energy based weapon? like they got on the navy ship

avator
Mathew Robinson
Livonia, NY 路 a month ago

And that鈥檚 the gun that Arnold Schwarzenegger held in his hand in that movie where he was a US Marshall protecting a witness that knew all about selling this stuff overseas to our enemies for Cash and other things in the movie was awesome. Arnold Schwarzenegger held one of those guns in each handand level the entire compound with two handheld rail guns one person that鈥檚 incredible. Imagine 100 people holding them.

avator
Mark Opie
Alamo, TX 路 20 days ago

Going above speed of sound

avator
Len
St Louis, MO 路 24 days ago

Hope this is American technology! W O W !!

avator
woodchuck
2 months ago

Barrel melts after five rds.

avator
Hank&Wendy
Williamsburg, KY 路 2 months ago

Powerful plus ballistic. Missile defense systems and other defensive weapons, can't lock on to it or change its territory with flares it could possibly be tracked with radar but its simply moving too fast to intercept with our current technology.Scary part is it could be equipped nuclear weapons..

avator
Johnny Weaver
Oxford, MS 路 2 months ago

Only good for a few shots,