15 Comments

avator
Guest
4 months ago

Becauce he was falsely charge pppfff keep up fool 🤔👍

avator
CheriLea Morton
Deming, NM · 4 months ago

Carroll's case was a civil case, not a criminal case.

avator
SLOVE2
Lancaster, CA · 4 months ago

He’s afraid of where else his DNA may come up😂😂😂😂😂🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

avator
JRod
4 months ago

fake fake fake

avator
Christina Mccracken
Alexandria, LA · 4 months ago

defamation I hope he sues you

avator
Hope
4 months ago

because it was theater

avator
Linda Hope
Reno, NV · 4 months ago

There was nothing on the dress and refused to give it for testing

avator
Jim Ward
Simi Valley, CA · 4 months ago

She has the dress 30 yrs later ? What a joke. The lies of the left are disgusting

avator
Deede
4 months ago

He was not convicted!!! Big difference!!!

avator
bikerchicknyc
4 months ago

34 entries on a piece of paper that was not labeled what they deemed should have been labeled. Don’t get this twisted. Stop being parrots to the lies. 🤦🏽‍♀️

avator
Julian T. Navarro Jr.
El Monte, CA · 4 months ago

And the appeals court, already reverse this illegal judge ruling. And this Judge will probably be disbarred and imprisoned.

avator
Lulu
Lilburn, GA · 4 months ago

Nobody wanted to get that close to his spit

avator
Julian T. Navarro Jr.
El Monte, CA · 4 months ago

Probably because, it's still going through the legal system. Remember, give DNA until, it goes alway through the legal process. And the appeals court already ruled this judge violated the law.